This morning, Justice John Paul Stevens announced
his plans to retire from the United States Supreme
Court in just a few months giving President Obama
another opportunity to place a liberal activist
judge atop our judiciary system. As Americans,
our personal freedoms are under assault. With an
extreme liberal Democrat President and large
Democrat majorities in the House and Senate, one
of our only lines of defense is the Supreme Court.
If Democrats get their way and elect Congressman
Brad Ellsworth in November, there will be fewer
and fewer justices in the mold of Hoosier John
Roberts and Samuel Alito, whom Dan shepherded
through the confirmation process. Instead, we
will get more liberal ideologues when we need
justices that adhere to the intentions of our
Founding Fathers and don't view the Constitution
as a 'living document' that can be altered to
push their radical agenda.
Help send Dan Coats to the United States Senate
to support nominees for the Supreme Court
Friday, April 9, 2010
Send Dan Coats To U.S. Senate
Dan Coats Addresses the Ginsburg Vote
"On the Ginsburg vote, Coats has said that 'elections
have consequences.' There was a centuries-old
tradition of respecting national electoral results
by granting the President latitude in selecting
nominees for the bench. Case in point: 42 of 44
Republicans voted for Ginsburg. Coats can also point
to his assistance in helping Justice Samuel Alito
through a successful confirmation process in 2005-06.
Alito has joined the conservative side of the
Supreme Court."
Howey: Time Running Out To Catch Dan Coats
In a post on Howey Politics Indiana, Brian Howey
said, "For a statewide candidate to drive up
name identification in order to credibly deliver
a message that could help win an election, even
a primary, the price tag is somewhere in the $1
million range to purchase 3,000 to 4,000 gross
rating points, sans the Chicago broadcast TV
market. "For that reason, with less than a month
to go before the Republican U.S. Senate primary,
the window is quickly closing on candidates not
named Dan Coats...
"There have been some interesting shifts among
Coats' four opponents. Hostettler and State
Sen. Marvin Stutzman are now talking about their
own experience as opposed to restating their
earlier anti-incumbency lines... "The Coats
campaign responded [to Hostetter's YouTube video]
by noting that Coats has a 90 percent American
Conservative Union mark, compared to 89.35 for
Hostettler.
As for a vote cited by Hostettler as being a
pro-abortion vote, the campaign noted that Coats
supported a bill that prohibited the Peace Corps
from using development assistance funds for
abortions or involuntary sterilizations.
Thirty-six of the 44 Senate Republicans at the
time voted for the measure.
Dan Coats Hoosier Health Care Plan
This morning, Dan Coats released the
Dan Coats Hoosier Health Care Plan
http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1103285979075&s=1218&e=
001fRFZr6kD2W1Xs8H2wPprnGVC-rt2YBTFlhmnL1mZGWjiGfaX-
9PTnnW7PgiZeNvUgTUw21ic0jgh1AhH-QzJ_0zlR7K2Fn_dx1ZSS
TcVfDD598KIDdbp1z5VJhifBfACdwlzNOrzhIW8XRPK326161KJC
6IKO8FdKA8tPI5WBR4=].
Dan said, "Hoosiers have spoken: the goal should not
be expansion of government involvement in health
care, but instead a prescription for a healthier
system that lowers costs while preserving personal
freedoms.The elements of this plan are based
on the principle that individual consumer retain
control over their own decisions and calls for
policy changes only where there is broad public
support - without burying our children and
grandchildren in debt." You can read the full
Friday, April 2, 2010
Russ Pulliam Addresses Dan Coats Campaign
Look past Democrats' rhetoric
by Russ Pulliam
If Reggie Miller wanted to return to the Pacers in some capacity, would he be welcomed home? Of course.
So why haven't young conservatives welcomed Dan Coats' bid for his old Senate seat?Some conservatives have joined national Democrats in beating up Coats for the crime of lobbying. Or for being ambassador to Germany. Or for thinking about a retirement place in North Carolina.
It is a puzzle.
Coats, after all, was one of the most effective limited-government conservatives in the 1980s and 1990s. He started in the House of Representatives and then served in the Senate from 1989 to 1999. He also was ambassador to Germany.
Without bragging about it, Coats was an architect of what came to be called compassionate conservatism. He believed that conservatives could match big government social welfare initiatives with private sector alternatives. A key option was to let taxpayers send a portion of their tax bills, through credits, to charities that help those in need.
The theme of compassionate conservatism became a key to victory for George W. Bush. The concept was later tarnished when Republicans in Congress forgot to emphasize private-sector solutions instead of more government spending.
Yet Coats, Bush and former Indianapolis Mayor Steve Goldsmith made big strides just by increasing recognition, even on the liberal side, that community-based ministries and churches often are more effective in helping the needy than massive government programs.
Coats also has been a role model and mentor for other conservative leaders, including U.S. Rep. Mark Souder, Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson and Sagamore Institute President Jay Hein.
Coats is a modest gentleman who doesn't brag about his accomplishments. Yet he has always worn well with Indiana voters, through five House campaigns and two U.S. Senate victories.
Clearly, he has scared the daylights out of the Democratic Party. Once he jumped into the race earlier this year, Democratic insiders came up with all sorts of charges against the former senator. He wanted to live in North Carolina. He allegedly lobbied for Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez.
The puzzle is why some younger conservatives can't see through the partisan Democratic rhetoric to appreciate the talent that Coats offers. Even Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh appears to understand Coats' strengths. He decided not to seek re-election shortly after Coats entered the race.
Are younger conservatives so jaded about all political figures? Did Coats pick up radioactive contamination by serving in the Bush administration?
Coats may not know how to tweet on Twitter or share his personal life on Facebook. But conservatives of all people should know better than to dismiss a senatorial candidate simply because he has a long, serious record of political service.Thursday, March 25, 2010
Dan Coats, the anti-Obama
by Chris Cillizza
Washington Post
Former Indiana Sen. Dan Coats said he is running for Senate because of President Obama. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Image
Ask Dan Coats why he decided to come out of political retirement to seek the Indiana Senate seat he vacated in 1998 and he offers just two words: "Barack Obama".
"What I saw him doing went against everything I have ever believed, everything I have ever stood for," Coats said in an interview with the Fix earlier this week. "I saw this country in a tailspin under this agenda."
That Coats, a Republican who held a seat in the Senate from 1989 to 1998, would so explicitly run against Obama speaks to the drastic shift in the political winds since the President carried the Hoosier State in 2008. (Obama was the first Democratic presidential candidate to win Indiana since Lyndon B. Johnson.)
"He carried [the state] based on this hope and change promise," said Coats. "He carried [it] not on the basis of what he has done the past year."
Coats' surprise entrance in the race -- he decided to run in early February -- against Sen. Evan Bayh (D) was cast by national Republicans as evidence that the favorable national political environment was putting races in play that no one thought might be competitive.
Little did we know that Bayh would stun the political world by retiring less than two weeks after Coats entered the contest, drastically increasing Democrats' vulnerability in the race and raising at least the specter of a Republican Senate takeover.
Coats seemed to be sitting pretty after the Bayh retirement but was taken badly off course by a coordinated -- and devastatingly effective -- campaign by national Democrats to draw attention to his past as a lobbyist and some of his less-than-politic pronouncements, most notably a video that surfaced in which he told a group of North Carolinians that he planned to retire to the Tarheel State.
Coats acknowledged that he got off to a less-than-ideal start, largely due to the fact that he never thought he would be running again for public office. "I wouldn't have said that" if he had been planning a return bid, Coats said of his North Carolina comment. "But I did."
Coats insisted, however, that the charges of nefariousness in his lobbying work (and clients) was entirely off base and boomeranged against the Democrats who made them. "I don't apologize for that," Coats said of his lobbying work. "What they have thrown at me is factually wrong."
Assuming Coats is the Republican nominee -- and he faces a primary fight on May with, among others, former Rep. John Hostettler -- he will work to frame the general election between himself and Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D) in the national political context while Ellsworth will almost certainly try to make the race more local.
That push-pull is present in a number of contested Senate races -- including in places like Colorado, Arkansas and Nevada among others -- where Democratic incumbents are trying to run narrow-bore races focused on themselves and not the national party and their Republican opponents are hoping to turn the contests into a referendum on Democrats in Washington broadly.
"People are distraught over what has happened in Washington," said Coats of the mood in his home state -- adding that he never before seen close to the amount of "anger, fear and engagement" in the electorate at large. "People feel like they were sold a bill of goods," he said.
How much -- and how quickly has the political face of Indiana changed since 2008? Coats is placing a big bet that the change is drastic and that running explicitly against Obama will pay electoral dividends. Democrats have to hope he is wrong.
Dan Coats Interview With Cal Thomas
Dan Coats for Indiana
http://dancoatsforindiana.blogspot.com
Ex-senator wants to reenter the ring
BY CAL THOMAS
tmseditors@tribune.com
Given the toxic nature of Washington -- and especially after the crushing defeat of Republicans by the congressional Democrat majority -- why would anyone want to be part of this, especially one who has been there before?
It is the first question I put to Dan Coats, a Republican from Indiana, who is running for his old Senate seat. Coats served four terms in the House and almost two in the Senate (he took Dan Quayle's seat in 1989 when Quayle became vice president) before voluntarily retiring to a comfortable private life.
``I deliberately avoided stopping at a psychiatrist's office on the way to making this decision,'' he tells me over breakfast at an Arlington, Va., diner. Coats, who must first defeat four opponents in the Republican primary on May 4, says he is motivated to run after ``watching for a year with increasing frustration and anger what is happening to our country and saying, `Do I want to go quietly into the night and enjoy the fruits of my labors or do I want to throw myself back in and see if I can do something about it?' ''
Coats thinks America is ``sliding into mediocrity,'' and we are losing the values that inspired ``The Greatest Generation.'' He describes the familiar conservative litany: ``Limited government, lower taxes, a balanced budget, strong defense.''
I asked him if that were practical, and he answered No, though he thinks reasserting those principles is necessary if America is to survive as a free and strong nation.
What does he think recommends him to Indiana voters, and what would he do differently this time, if elected?
``I think the greatest thing going for me is age and experience, because at a certain point in life you stop thinking about your career and start thinking about what can you leave for the next generation and my country. It's not about positioning yourself with a vote. It's about going (to Washington) and doing what you know is the right thing to do.''
Didn't Coats and his fellow Republicans have the opportunity to do the right thing when they were in power in the recent past, but in the minds of many conservatives, blew it? He acknowledges as much and believes that conservative Republicans have learned their lesson.
What does that mean? Would he, for example, work to repeal the healthcare law?
``Absolutely. I would do everything I could to turn around this liberal-socialist agenda that Pelosi and Reid are imposing on the American people. If nominated and elected, I will have the backing of the people of Indiana to go to Washington and turn things around structurally and reform entitlement programs. The only way we're going to get at our deficit is to reform entitlement programs. They will all go bankrupt if we don't do something to put them on a better fiscal standing.''
Coats thinks the choices faced by the country are stark and menacing: ``We can either watch our country slide into mediocrity and a socialist European-style nation that cheers when they get 1 percent GDP growth, or we can put our country back to the principles that made us different from every other country in the world.''
Coats wants to counter the stories told by liberal Democrats of gloom and despair with uplifting stories of people who have overcome challenges that he thinks will inspire others. In an age when feeling good is preferred to thinking right, that's a tall order, but there's no reason not to take him at his word. Why else would someone who has been there and done that do it again, unless he's of unsound mind?
Maybe it's better to avoid that visit to the psychiatrist for now.
Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/03/25/1546040/ex-senator-wants-to-reenter-the.html#ixzz0jC9O2ffQ
Dan Coats - Latest Rasmussen Poll
Two of the three top Republican hopefuls for the U.S. Senate in Indiana continue to hold double-digit leads over Democratic Congressman Brad Ellsworth. Ellsworth supported President Obama’s health care plan in a state where opposition to the legislation is higher than it is nationally.
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in the state finds former Congressman John Hostettler with a 50% to 32% lead over Ellsworth, a current House member who voted with most other Democrats on Sunday to pass the health care plan. The survey was taken last Wednesday and Thursday nights. Fifteen percent (15%) remain undecided in that match-up.
Ex-Senator Dan Coats now posts a 49% to 34% lead over Ellsworth, with 12% undecided.
Ellsworth runs best against the third GOP contender, freshman State Senator Marvin Stutsman. In that match-up, Stutsman leads by just seven points, 41% to 34%. Eighteen percent (18%) are undecided.
Fifteen percent (15%) of Indiana voters have a very favorable opinion of Ellsworth, while 14% view him very unfavorably.
Hostettler is viewed very favorably by 13% and very unfavorably by 10%.
For Coats, who served as a senator from Indiana from 1989 to 1999, very favorables are 15% and very unfavorables 11%.
Six percent (6%) have a very favorable view of Stutzman, while eight percent (8%) regard him very unfavorably.
At this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
MENDING FENCES: RENEWING JUSTICE BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY
Dan Coats and Bill Bennett: "Project for American Renewal"
In 1995, Senator Dan Coats introduced a package of legislative proposals to help empower local, community-based institutions that were addressing social problems. Crafted with the help of Bill Bennett, a co-director of Empower America, the "Project for American Renewal," comprised 19 separate bills designed to use public policy - and public resources - to energize mainly private efforts to meet human needs. They included:
- The Mentor Schools Act, to provide grants of $1 million to school districts to develop “same gender” schools.
- The Role Model Academy Act, to establish an innovative residential academy for at-risk youth.
- The Kinship Care Act, to create a $30 million demonstration program for states to use adult relatives as the preferred placement option for children separated from their parents.
- The Restitution and Responsibility Act, to provide grants to states for programs to make restitution to victims of crime.
- The Assets for Independence Act, to create a four-year, $100 million demonstration program to establish 50,000 Individual Development Accounts, to be used for the purchase of home, college education or small business.
- The Community Partnership Act, to institute demonstration grants for programs to match communities of faith with welfare recipients and nonviolent criminal offenders.
Bill Bennett Fundraiser For Dan Coats

Dear Fellow Hoosier:
Like you, over the past year I have grown
increasingly frustrated and alarmed by the
dangerous path the Democrats are taking us
down.This national emergency is something
I've never seen before and never thought
would happen to America.
President Obama and his allies in Congress
have the wrong priorities and are forcing
an extreme left liberal agenda on the
country. I share your deep concern about
what's happening to our country and the
legacy we're going to leave for our children
and our grandchildren if we don't stand up
now and fight back hard. That's why I'm
running for the United States Senate.
But I cannot do it alone; I need your
support and am asking you to join me for
a fund raiser with special guest
Dr. Bill Bennett
on
Wednesday, March 24th
at
6:00 p.m.
in
Carmel, Indiana.
If you are unable to attend, but would
like to support my campaign and receive
updates, please visit my website at
www.coatsforindiana.com.
Getting our country back on track and
getting Hoosiers back to work will take
more than just saying "NO!" to what the
Democrats are doing; although it is
never wrong to say no to a bad idea. We
also need to explain how we would fix
things when we earn that leadership role
again.
This year, we will give voters a choice
between the new status quo of runaway
spending and skyrocketing debt on one
hand -- and someone committed to making
the difficult decisions necessary to stop
the bleeding and set a course for recovery
from this extreme liberalism.
I ask for your support. If we work
together, we prevail. Bill Bennett and I
look forward to seeing you on Wednesday,
March 24 in Carmel!
Thank you,
Dan Coats
P.S.
Please visit my website at
www.coatsforindiana.com
to sign up for updates and to learn
more about my reception with special
guest Dr. Bill Bennett on March 24th.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Monday, March 8, 2010
Coats Continues to Show Calm Command of Issues
Saturday morning, U.S. Senate candidate Dan Coats
joined four other Republicans vying for their
party's nomination at a forum in Warsaw, Indiana.
As Coats' opponents attacked each other throughout
the event, he remained calm and focused on issues
important to Hoosiers during this critical period
in our history.
Fox News' Steve Brown: "Through it all...Coats kept
his cool. He talked about his faith. He talked about
freedom. He talked about eliminating federal
'earmarks'. He talked about abolishing the US
Department of Education. All met with approval of
the Tea Partiers gathered." Brown added,
"Afterwards...Coats told Fox News he was ready to
talk to Hoosiers anywhere in the state...and that
includes Tea Party folks."
(Fox News, Facing the Tea Party, 3/6/10)
Journal Gazette's Angela Mapes Turner: "A calm
Coats...told the crowd he believes his time
serving in the Army, in Congress and as an
ambassador - all during times of war - sets him
apart. Most importantly, he said, the GOP needs
to be united in its efforts. 'It's never wrong
to say no to a bad idea,' he said. 'We have to come
forward with constructive solutions.'"
(Journal Gazette,
GOP Hopefuls Ramp Up Rhetoric in Debate, 3/7/10)
"A pattern has emerged in Dan's appearances before
voters - a clear command of the issues facing our
Nation today. On the economy, jobs, health care and
national security - Dan Coats is the one candidate
able to channel our frustrations into plans for
action and the ability to implement common-sense
Hoosier values to fix our Nation's problems from
Day One," said press secretary Pete Seat.
Key Indiana Conservatives On Dan Coats

WHAT THEY'RE SAYING:
(INDIANAPOLIS, March 8, 2010) - Recently, Conservative
Hoosier leaders have recognized Dan Coats is the best
candidate to utilize common sense Hoosier values to
tackle the irresponsible spending sprees, mounting debt
and security challenges brought about by our Nation's
current Democratic leadership.
Here's what they're saying:
Dan's Conservative Principles
Congressman Mike Pence: "His integrity and conservative
record would make him the ideal candidate for Hoosiers."
(Congressional Quarterly, 2/3/10)
Congressman Steve Buyer: "Dan Coats is a man of
principle."
(Boone County Lincoln Day Dinner, 3/4/10)
Dan's Record
Governor Mitch Daniels: "He's got a real following in
the state. He deserves to. He was a really, really good
senator."
(Howey Politics Indiana, 2/24/10)
Attorney General Greg Zoeller: "I think what Sen.
Coats brings to the race is just a different level
of experience. It's really a different level of
candidacy."
(Politico, 2/13/10)
Dan's Chances Against the Democrat
Congressman Mark Souder: "He's our best chance to
win,"
(Journal Gazette, 2/4/10)
Dan's Ability to Start on Day One
Former State Representative & former U.S. Senate
candidate Dan Dumezich: "Dan Coats will be prepared
to answer the call of duty in this time of need. I'm
certain that he is the most qualified candidate to
save our great country."
(Release, 3/5/10)
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Coats Unscathed at GOP Event

Other candidates don’t refer to his lobbying career
Tom Davies
New Castle: The five Republicans who want to replace retiring Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh shared a stage for the first time just hours after the race for the Democratic pick cleared up more, with Rep. Baron Hill saying that he would seek re-election to the House and endorsed Rep. Brad Ellsworth for the Senate seat.None of the four other Republican candidates at Saturday’s Henry County GOP event brought up the questions that Coats has faced over his work as a Washington lobbyist and his years spent away from Indiana.
All drew frequent applause from the crowd of about 200 people in a Moose lodge by faulting President Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress for their handling of the economy, push for revamping the health care system and increased federal spending.
“Washington is completely out of touch with America,” said state Sen. Marlin Stutzman of Howe. “I believe that people voted to change Washington, not to change America.”
Coats has the backing of national Republicans since he launched his Senate campaign Feb. 3, but his attempt at a political comeback 18 years after he was last on a ballot didn’t prompt any of the other candidates to drop their campaigns.
Coats reassured the crowd Saturday of his intentions if he wins the party’s nomination in the May 4 primary.
“I’ve re-engaged because I care deeply about my country and care deeply about the future of this country and am fearful, absolutely fearful, about where we’re headed,” he said.
The Republican primary campaign has taken on greater importance since Bayh’s Feb. 15 announcement that he wouldn’t seek a third termFriday, February 26, 2010
Dan Coats Moves Ahead In Polling
Indiana polling
The Indiana political reporter Ed Feigenbaum reports:
Polling last Monday and Tuesday for a congressional candidate in one hotly contested primary found the Senate primary race to be a runaway of sorts in that particular district for [Dan Coats] ... leading the field by a wide percentage margin well into the double digits, with only one of the other hopefuls [John Hostetler] even breaking the 10 percent support threshold — and [conservative favorite Marlin Stutzman] checking in at a surprisingly low 2 percent — but with boatloads of yet-undecided voters.
A source who's seen the poll of GOP primary voters confirmed the account and says it was from Indiana's 4th District.
Politico
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Dan Coats on the Democrats Approach to the War On Terror
“I would characterize it as the failure of
the liberal left to understand the realities
of the world that we live in and the threats
to the world order as well as threats to
America. There’s always been this thought
that we’ve taken too strong of a position.
If we just open up our hands and embrace
our enemies, they will see the folly of their
ways and their policies. That was a
theoretical position of liberals. Once they
got in charge of everything, total control
of the government, they tried it. And it has
been the failure across the board. There was
Gitmo. There was homeland defense. Whether it
is dealing with adversaries that see all of
this as a sign of weakness. I think that has
been demonstrated in great detail for
Americans to look at. And I think the
understanding now is that that has been a
total failure.”
T
Dan Coats on Iran
“What do we do now? I think we face up to the
facts and let the American people and the
world know that everybody has to eat their words.
Everyone on both sides of the aisle, on both
sides of the Atlantic, around the world, has
said it is unacceptable to allow Iran to
obtain nuclear weapons. And yet, no one has
gone past that point and said “If it’s
unacceptable, what are we going to do?” And now
it seems we’re being asked to accept the
unacceptable.”
T





